Survey of Practice Patterns of Airway Management: A Comparison between Academic and Nonacademic Setups in Karnataka

Authors

  •   Ananth Somayaji Department of Anaesthesiology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka
  •   U. S. Raveendra Department of Anaesthesiology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka

Keywords:

Airway practice patterns, difficult airway, laryngeal mask airway, supraglottic airway device

Abstract

Background: Airway management is a core skill for an anaesthesiologist. However, the patterns of airway management practice vary among different practitioners, institutions, hospitals, and regions in India. In view of the limited literature in this regard, a survey was undertaken to assess different airway approach among anaesthesiologists of Karnataka. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective survey of 300 anaesthesiologists from Karnataka of varying backgrounds, from freelancers to academic departments. A prospective four‑part questionnaire with 30 questions was sent to individual anaesthesiologists. Information was collected and data analyzed for demographic data, type, and preference of airway techniques and devices, availability of support, training, and complications. Results: i‑gel was the most commonly used supraglottic airway device (SGAD) across age groups. There were significant differences in choice of drugs for insertion of SGAD among practitioners and academic consultants. For intubations, Vecuronium was preferred for adult patients, while Atracurium for children. The most common complication reported was desaturation and bradycardia (46%) in children. Conclusion: Survey shows differences in the practice patterns between academic and freelance setups in terms of device, technique, and drugs used. There appears to be a need to address the reasons for this difference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-01

How to Cite

Somayaji, A., & Raveendra, U. S. (2016). Survey of Practice Patterns of Airway Management: A Comparison between Academic and Nonacademic Setups in Karnataka. Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal, 2(4), 105–107. Retrieved from http://karnatakaanesthesiajournal.in/index.php/kaj/article/view/139213

Issue

Section

Original Articles

References

Kadar SM, Koshy R. Survey of supraglottic airway devices usage in anaesthetic practice in South Indian State. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:190‑3.

Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the I‑gel airway: A novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia 2005;60:1022‑6.

Choi CG, Yang KH, Jung JK, Han JU, Lee CS, Cha YD, et al. Endotracheal intubation using i‑gel® and lightwand in a patient with difficult airway: A case report. Korean J Anesthesiol 2015;68:501‑4.

Keller C, Brimacombe J. Spontaneous versus controlled respiration with the laryngeal mask. A review. Anaesthesist 2001;50:187‑91.

Suzanna AB, Liu CY, Rozaidi SW, Ooi JS. Comparison between LMA‑Classic and AMBU AuraOnce laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation. Med J Malaysia 2011;66:304‑7.