A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Control Study of Duration of Analgesic Effect of Epidural Lignocaine 1.5% with Adrenaline and Neostigmine in 2 Different Doses for Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Authors

  •   K. Gunasheela Postgraduate student
  •   C. S. Sanikop MD, Professor

Keywords:

No keywords

Abstract

Several studies using neostigmine as an adjuvant to local anesthestics (LA) for intrathecal anaesthesia are available in literature all claiming obvious advantages; but neostigmine as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics for epidural anesthesia has not been studied yet. We have conducted a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial on 30 ASA I and II patients of both sexes who were scheduled to undergo elective lower abdominal surgeries. The patients were allocated to three groups and received epidural anesthesia with 1.5% lignocaine with 90ï­g adrenaline with either saline (G1), neostigmine10ï­g/kg (G2) and 15ï­g/kg (G3). The onset of sensory block, duration of postoperative analgesia and associated hemodynamic changes and sequelae between the three groups were studied. Pain was assessed using a 10cm visual analog scale (VAS). Addition of neostigmine to lignocaine resulted in decrease in onset of analgesia but prolonged the duration of analgesia with no sequelae.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-01

How to Cite

Gunasheela, K., & Sanikop, C. S. (2007). A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Control Study of Duration of Analgesic Effect of Epidural Lignocaine 1.5% with Adrenaline and Neostigmine in 2 Different Doses for Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal, (1), 1–9. Retrieved from http://karnatakaanesthesiajournal.in/index.php/kaj/article/view/139897

Issue

Section

Articles

References

Yaksh TL, Dirksen R, Harty GJ:Antinociceptive effects intrathecally Injected cholinomimetic drugs in the rat and cat. Eur J.Pharmacol 1985; 117; 81-8.

Bouaziz H. Tong C, Eisenach JC; Postoperative analgesia from intrathecal neostigmine in sheep, Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 1140-4.

Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Tuttle R:Phase I safety assessment of intrathecal neostigmine methylsulfate in humans Anesthesiology 1995; 82:331-43

Lauretti GR, Reis MP, Prado WA, Klamt JG:Dose-response study of intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal neostigmine their combination or placebo for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing anterior and posterior vaginoplasty. Anesth Analg 1996 ; 82: 1182-7.

Krukowski JA Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Mallak KA, Parker RL; Intrathecal neostigmine for post-cesarean section analgesia: dose response. Anesth Analg 1997;84:1269-75

Lauretti GR, Mattos AL, Reis MP, Prado WA: Intrathecal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia after orthopedic surgery J. Clin Anesth 1997; 9:473-7

Lauretti GR, Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Pfeifer BL; A multiple-centre study of intrathecal neostigmine for analgesia following vaginal hysterectomy Anesthesiology 1998;89:913-8

Lauretti GR, De Oliverira RD, Reis MP, Juliao MC, Pereira NL; study of three different doses of epidural neostigmine coadmin-istered with lidoaine for postoperative analgesia Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1534-8

Lauretti GR, Lima IC: The effects of intrathecal neostigmine on somatic and visceral pain:improvement by association with a peripheral anticholinergic. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:617-20

Naguib M, Yaksh TL; Antinociceptive effects of spinal cholinest erase inhibition and isobolographic analysis of the interaction with ï­ and alpha 2 receptor systems. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:1338-48

Zhuo M, Gebhart GF, Inhabitation of a cutaneous nociceptive reflex by a noxious viceral stimulus is mediated by spinal cholinergic and descending serotonergic systems in the rat. Brain Res 1992; 585:7-18

Wamsley JK, Lewis Young WS 3d Kuhar MJ, Autoradiographic Localization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in rat brain

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.