A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Control Study of Duration of Analgesic Effect of Epidural Lignocaine 1.5% with Adrenaline and Neostigmine in Two Different Doses for Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Authors

  •   K. Gunasheela M.B.B.S., Postgraduate Student, Department of Anaesthesiology JNMC, Belgaum
  •   C.S. Sanikop MD, Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology JNMC, Belgaum

Abstract

A prospective double blind randomized controlled trail was conducted on 30 patients scheduled to undergo elective lower abdominal surgeries. The patients were allocated to three groups and received epidural anaesthesia with 1.5% lignocaine with QOpg adrenaline with either saline, neostigmine lO^g/kg. and 15|jg/kg. The onset of sensory block, duration of postoperative analgesia and associated hemodynamic changes and sequelae between the three groups were studied. Addition of neostigmine to lignocaine resulted in decrease in on.set of analgesia but prolonged the duration of analgesia with no sequelae.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-02-19

How to Cite

Gunasheela, K., & Sanikop, C. (2007). A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Control Study of Duration of Analgesic Effect of Epidural Lignocaine 1.5% with Adrenaline and Neostigmine in Two Different Doses for Lower Abdominal Surgeries. Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal, 8(1), 8–12. Retrieved from http://karnatakaanesthesiajournal.in/index.php/kaj/article/view/143343

Issue

Volume 8, Issue 1, 2007

Section

Articles

References

Yaksh TL, Dirksen R, Harty GJ: Antinociceptive effects intrathecally Injected cholinomimetic drugs in the rat and cat.

Bouaziz H. Tong C, Eisenach JC; Postoperative analgesia from intrathecal neostigmine in sheep, Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 1140-4.

Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Tuttle R:Phase I safety 8) assessment of intrathecal neostigmine methylsulfate in humans ; Anesthesiology 1995; 82:331-43

Lauretti GR, Reis MP, Prado WA, Klamt JG: Doseresponse study of intrathecal morphine versus

intrathecal neostigmine their combination or 9) placebo for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing anterior and posterior vaginoplasty ; Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 1182-7.

Krukowski JA Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Mallak KA, 10) Parker RL; Intrathecal neostigmine for postcesarean section analgesia: dose response ; Anesth Analg 1997; 84: 1269-75

Lauretti GR, Mattos AL, Reis MP, Prado WA: 11) Intrathecal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia after orthopedic surgery ; J. Clin Anesth 1997; 9:473-7

Lauretti GR, Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Pfeifer BL ; A multiple centre study of intrathecal neostigmine for analgesia following vaginal hysterectomy; Anaesthesiology 1998; 89:913-

Lauretti GR, De Oliverira RD, Reis MP, Juliao MC, Pereira NL; study of three different doses of epidural neostigmine coadmin-istered with lidoaine for postoperative analgesia Anaesthesilogy

;90:1534-8

. Lauretti GR, Lima IC: The effects of intrathecal neostigmine on somatic and visceral

pain:improvement by association with a peripheral anticholinergics ; Anesth Analg 1996; 82:617-2

. Naguib M, Yaksh TL; Antinociceptive effects of spinal cholinesterase inhibition and isobographic analysis of the interaction with ? and alpha 2 receptor systems. ; Anesthesiology 1994; 80:1338-48

Zhuo M, Gebhart GF, Inhabitation of a cutaneous nociceptive reflex by a noxious visceral stimulus is mediated by spinal cholinergic and descending serotonergic systems in the rat ; Brain Res 1992; 585:7-18