Comparison of Respiratory Mechanics - Volume Controlled Ventilation Versus Pressure Controlled Ventilation using Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Cross-over Study

Authors

  •   Amardeep Kulkarni Senior Resident Anaesthesiology, Sakra World Hospital, Bengaluru - 560103, Karnataka
  •   R. S. Raghavendra Rao Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Insitute, Bengaluru - 560002, Karnataka
  •   S. S. Nethra Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Insitute, Bengaluru - 560002, Karnataka
  •   D. Devikarani Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Insitute, Bengaluru - 560002, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj/2018/v16i1/141894

Keywords:

Laparoscopy, Pressure Control Ventilation, Proseal LMA, Volume Control Ventilation

Abstract

Background and aim: Pressure Controlled Ventilation (PCV) is claimed to be superior to Volume Controlled Ventilation (VCV) but with insufficient evidence. The aim was to compare the respiratory mechanics in VCV and PCV with Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods and Materials: Study was conducted involving 50 ASA I and II patients aged 20-50 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in this open label study. Patients were randomly allocated into group V and group P. Induction and maintenance of anaesthesia was uniform in both groups. All patients received Volume Controlled Ventilation till pneumoperitoneum, following which patients in group V received volume controlled ventilation for 20 minutes and switched over to PCV and vice versa for group P (PCV). Ventilator parameters for PCV and VCV were uniformly set initially irrespective of group allocation and adjusted later to maintain PaCO2 35 – 45 mm of Hg and SpO2 > 95%. Baseline hemodynamic parameters and respiratory parameters like peak and mean airway pressures, compliance were recorded during each mode of ventilation for 20 minutes. Data analyzed using IBM SPSS software version 20, Student T-test applied, P value < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Demographic data was comparable between two study groups. Peak airway Pressures (Ppeak) were 24.2 ± 2.38 cm of H20 during VCV and 22.46 ± 2.07 cm of H20 during PCV respectively (P value 0.019). Compliance was found to be 20.58 ± 5.1 cm of H20 during VCV and 21.56 ± 5.1 cm of H20 during PCV respectively (P-value 0.016). Airway resistance and expired tidal volumes were comparable. None of patients had desaturation or hypercarbia. Conclusion: Pressure controlled ventilation is better than volume controlled ventilation in terms of lower airway pressures and increased dynamic compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-10

How to Cite

Kulkarni, A., Raghavendra Rao, R. S., Nethra, S. S., & Devikarani, D. (2019). Comparison of Respiratory Mechanics - Volume Controlled Ventilation Versus Pressure Controlled Ventilation using Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Cross-over Study. Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal, 16(1-2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj/2018/v16i1/141894

Issue

Volume 16, Issue 1-2, January-June 2018

Section

Original Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Joris JL. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Erikson LL, Fleischer LA, Kronish JPW, Young WL, editor. Miller’s Anaesthesia 7th Ed Vol I. United states of America: Churchill livingstone; 2010. p. 4678–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-06959-8.00068-6

Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Langen KE, Anderson K. A randomized comparison of the LMA Supreme and LMA Proseal in children. Anaesthesia.2012;67:632–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652044.2012.07088.x. PMid:22420717

Sharma B, Sehgal R, Sahai C, Sood J. PLMA vs I-gel: A comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010; 26(4):451–57. PMid:21547168. PMCid:PMC3087251

Ibrahim M, Ragab A, Elshammaa H. I-gel vs cuffed tracheal tube during volume controlled ventilation in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Egy J of Anaesiol. 2011; 27(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2010.12.003

Prella M, Feihl F, Guido D. Effects of short-term pressure controlled ventilation on gas exchange, in patients with acute lung injury/ARDS. Chest. 2002; 122:1382–8 https:// doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.4.1382. PMid:12377869

Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L. Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000; 44:834–41. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440709.x. PMid:10939696

Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Ventilatory effects, blood gas changes, and oxygen consumption during laparoscopichysterectomy.Anesth Analg 1995; 80:961–6.https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199505000-00018.PMid:7726439

Baerdemaeker DL, Herten VC, Gillardin JM, Pattyn P, Mortier EP, Szegedi LL. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients. Obesity Surgery. 2008; 18:680–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695007-9376-8. PMid:18317856

Cadi P, Guenoun T, Journois D, Chevallier JM, Diehl JL, Safran D. Pressure controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation. Br. J. Anaesth.2008; 100(5):709–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen067.PMid:18407943

Davis K, Branson RD, Campbell RS, Porembka DT. Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: Is flow waveform the difference? The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 1996; 41:808– 14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199611000-00007.PMid:8913208

Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Anaesth. 2002; 88(6):824–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/88.6.824

Belena JM, Ochoa EJ, Nunez M, Gilsanz C, Vidal A. Role of laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Nov 27; 7(11):319–25. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v7.i11.319. PMid:26649155. PMCid:PMC4663386

Anand K, Goel N, Singh M, Kapoor D. Comparison of the supreme and the proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Anesthesiologica Taiwanica. 2016; 54:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2016.03.001. PMid:27106162

Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H. Use of Proseal laryngeal mask airway for pressure controlled ventilation with or without positive end-expiratory pressure in paediatric patients: A randomized, controlled study. Br. J. Anaesth.2005; 95(6):831–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei246. PMid:16199419

Tyagi A, Kumar R, Sethi AK, Mohta M. A comparison of pressure-controlled and volume controlled ventilation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anaesthesia. 2011; 66:503– 08. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06713.x. PMid:21501131

Sen O, Umutoglu T, Aydin N, Toptas M, Tutuncu AC, Bakan M. Effects of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics and systemic stress response during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Springer Plus Open Journal. 2016; 5:298.

Gupta SD, Kundu SB, Ghose T, Maji S, Mitra K, Mukherjee M, et al. A comparison between volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled ventilation in providing better oxygenation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Anesth. 2012; 56:276–82. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.98777. PMid:22923828. PMCid:PMC3425289

Natalini G, Lanza G, Rosano A, Dell’Agnolo P, Bernardini A. Standard laryngeal Mask Airway™ and LMA-ProSeal™ during laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15(6):428–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(03)00085-0

Jeon WJ, Cho SY, Bang MR, Ko SY. Comparison of volume controlled and pressure controlled ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway in gynecological laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011; 60(3):167–72. https://doi.org/10.4097/ kjae.2011.60.3.167. PMid:21490817. PMCid:PMC3071479

Aymen S A El-Aziz. New supraglottic airway device; I-gel in Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy using volume controlled ventilation versus pressure controlled ventilation. Journal of American Science. 2011; 7(11):447–53.

Weber CCB, Montout MH, Nicholas P, Blanchet P, Stefen F. Respiratory and hemodynamic effects of volume controlled versus pressure controlled ventilation during laparoscopy: A cross over study using echocardiographic assessment. Br. J. Anaesth. 2007; 99(3):429–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/ aem166. PMid:17626027

Wang JP. Mechanical ventilation in laparoscopic surgery.Clinical and Investigative Medicine. 2015; 38(3):119–41. https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v38i3.22707

Dheeraj K, Kiran B, Jasveer S, Kanav G, Shraddha S, Meghana S. Comparison of Volume Controlled Ventilation (VCV) and Pressure Controlled Ventilation(PCV) modes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Paripex Indian Journal of Research. 2018; 7(1):19–22.

Most read articles by the same author(s)