Study of Correlation between Airway Assessment Parameters and Intubating Success with Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway using PVC Endotracheal Tube – A Prospective Open Label Observational Study

Authors

  •   G. M. Chethana Department of Anesthesiology, ESI Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Rajajinagar, Bangalore – 560010, Karnataka
  •   G. P. Manjunath Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka
  •   C. Rathi Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka
  •   S. B. Lokesh Department of Anesthesiology, ESI Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Rajajinagar, Bangalore – 560010, Karnataka
  •   Devika Rani Duggappa Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka
  •   S. S. Nethra Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj/2018/v16i3-4/158020

Keywords:

Airway, Correlation, Intubating, Laryngeal Mask Airway

Abstract

Background and Aims: Evidence is limited regarding the correlation of airway assessment parameters with success rate of intubation with Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA). Aim was to assess the correlation between airway parameters and success rate of blind intubation with conventional polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube using ILMA. Methods: After ethical clearance and informed consent, 200 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Mallapatti class, upper lip bite test (ULBT) grade, thyromental distance (cm), mouth opening (cm), neck circumference were noted. Anaesthesia regimen was standardized, Cormack Lehane grade noted by laryngoscopy. Appropriate sized ILMA inserted as per standard technique and proper placement confirmed. Appropriate sized PVC tube was passed through the ILMA and its position in trachea confirmed. If intubation failed, two more attempts were allowed by rotating the tube 1800 before passing through ILMA. Number of attempts required for ILMA placement, intubation, success rate of intubation were noted. Complications such as desaturation, laryngospasm, sore throat, hoarseness were recorded if any. Results: Proper ILMA placement was successful in all patients. Blind intubation with PVC endotracheal tubes through ILMA was successful in 194 (97%) patients. There was no correlation between mouth opening, Mallampatti grade, thyromental distance, Cormack Lehane grade, neck circumference, ULBT class and success rates of ILMA insertion and intubation. Mean thyromental distance was 7.5 ± 0.8 cm in those intubated successfully and 5.5 ± 0.3 cm in failed intubations (p <0.001, Mann Whitney U test). Twenty two patients had sore throat and 29 patients had hoarseness of voice. Conclusion: Thyromental distance less than 5 cm is associated with increased number of attempts for intubation and failed intubation and no other airway assessment parameters influence the success rate of ILMA insertion and intubation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-19

How to Cite

Chethana, G. M., Manjunath, G. P., Rathi, C., Lokesh, S. B., Rani Duggappa, D., & Nethra, S. S. (2018). Study of Correlation between Airway Assessment Parameters and Intubating Success with Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway using PVC Endotracheal Tube – A Prospective Open Label Observational Study. Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal, 16(3-4), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj/2018/v16i3-4/158020

Issue

Volume 16, Issue 3-4, July-December 2018

Section

Clinical Investigations
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Addy AV et al. The intubating laryngeal mask airway. II. A preliminary clinical report of a new means of intubating the trachea. Br J Anaesth, 1997; 79:704–9.

Rosenblatt WH, Murphy M. The intubating laryngeal mask: Use of a new ventilating intubating device in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med, 1999; 33(2):234-38.

Akhlagh SH, Vaziri MT, Masoumi T et al. Hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy and intubating laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. Middle East J Anaesthesiol, 2011; 21(1):99-103.

Timmermann A, Russo SG, Crozier TA et al. Laryngoscopic versus Intubating LMA guided tracheal intubation by novice users – a manikin study. Resuscitation, 2007; 73(3):412-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.019

Chandy V, Mena G, Ferson DZ. Laryngeal mask airway. In: Benumof and Hagberg’s Airway Management. 3rd ed. Saunders: Elsevier; 2013.p.456.

Person DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, Osborn I, Ovassapian A. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology, 2001; 95:1175–1181. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542200111000-00022 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Sharma MU, Gombar S, Gombar KK, Singh B, Bhatia N. Endotracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Fastrachâ„¢): A randomized study of LMA- Fastrachâ„¢ wire-reinforced silicone endotracheal tube versus conventional polyvinyl chloride tracheal tube. Indian J Anaesth, 2013; 57:19-24. https://doi.org/10.4103/00195049.108555

Tara M. Hata, J Steven Hata, Paul G. Barash. Preoperative patient assessment and management, Clinical Anesthesia, 7th edition; Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.

Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ et al. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficulttomanage airways. Anesthesiology, 2001; 95:1175–1181. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200111000-00022

Bharti N and Naik AK. Ease of insertion and haemodynamic effects following tracheal intubation using Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway: A comparison with conventional Macintosh laryngoscope. Indian, J. Anaesth 2006; 50(3):205-08.

Zhang GH, Xue FS, Sun HY, et al. Comparative study of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airway and direct laryngoscope. Chin Med J, 2006; 119 (11):899-904. https://doi. org/10.1097/00029330-200606010-00004

Chan YW, Kong CF, Kong CS, Hwang NC and Ip-Yam PC. Intubating laryngeal mask airway: initial experience in Singapore. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1998; 81:610611. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/81.4.610

Kundra P, Sujata N and Ravishankar M. Conventional tracheal tubes for intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg, 2005; 100:284-8. https://doi. org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000139348.00435.33

Lu PP, Yang CH, Ho ACY, et al. The intubating LMA: a comparison of insertion techniques with conventional tracheal tubes. Can J Anaesth, 2000; 47:849–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03019663

Nakazawa K, Tanaka N, Ishikawa S, et al. Using the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA-Fastrach TM) for blind endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cervical spine operation. Anesth Analg, 1999; 89:1319-21. https:// doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199911000-00047

Staikou C, Tsaroucha A, Paraskeva A et al. Association between factors predicting and assessing the airway and use of intubating laryngeal mask airway. M E J Anaesth, 2010; 20(4):553-58.

Shah VR, Bhosale GP, Mehta T, Parikh GP. A comparison of conventional endotracheal tube with silicone wirereinforced tracheal tube for intubation through intubating laryngeal mask airway. Saudi J Anaesth, 2014; 8(2):1837. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.130702 PMID: 24843329; PMCID: PMC4024673.

Ye L, Liu J, Wong T et al. Effects of tracheal tube orientation on the success of intubation through an intubating laryngeal mask airway: study in Mallampatti class 3 or 4 patients. British Journal of anaesthesia, 2009; 102:269-72. https:// doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen365 PMid:19151052

Kapila A, Addy EV, Verghese C, et al. The intubating laryngeal mask airway: an initial assessment and performance. Br J Anaesth, 1997; 79:710–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ bja/79.6.710 PMid:9496200

Ye L, Wong T, Liu J et al. Mallampati class does not affect the success rate of intubation through an intubating laryngeal mask airway with reverse tracheal tube direction. Minerva Anestesiologica, 2013; 79:227-31.

Most read articles by the same author(s)