Comparison of Ventilation and Haemodynamic Parameters between I-Gel and Proseal LMA in Adult Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia

Authors

  •   R. Nisarga Department of Anaesthesiology, BMCRI, Bangalore, Karnataka
  •   D. A. Bhavana Department of Anaesthesiology, BMCRI, Bangalore, Karnataka
  •   D. Devika Rani Department of Anaesthesiology, BMCRI, Bangalore, Karnataka
  •   S. S. Nethra Department of Anaesthesiology, BMCRI, Bangalore, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj/2019/v17i3-4/150719

Keywords:

I-Gel, Oropharyngeal Seal Pressure, Pneumoperitoneum, Proseal LMA

Abstract

Background: The Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) has been used as a safe alternative to endotracheal tube for many laparoscopic procedures while the I-Gel is still being evaluated for its use in anaesthesia with positive pressure ventilation in laparoscopic surgeries. Our aim was to compare ventilation and hemodynamic parameters between I-Gel and PLMA. Methods: 50 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, namely, the group-A (Proseal, n = 25) and the group-B (I-Gel, n = 25). Premedication and anaesthesia technique was standardized in both groups. Airway device was inserted as per group allocation after induction of anaesthesia. Oropharyngeal Seal Pressure (OSP) was recorded. Airway pressures, compliance and resistance, tidal volumes were recorded after insertion of SGA device at 5 min intervals before pneumoperitoneum, 10 minute intervals during pneumoperitoneum and at 5 min intervals after release of pneumoperitoneum till removal of device. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure were recorded after insertion of the device, 1 min and every 5 min throughout the surger. Results: Demographic parameters were comparable. OSP was higher with group B (32.16 + 2.61 cmH2O, P<0.001). Peak and mean airway pressures increased in both groups during pneumoperitoneum, but Ppeak increased more in group-A (8.62 ± 1.59 cmH2O, P< 0.001) and Pmean increased more in group B (4.19 ± 1.00 cmH2O, P<0.001). Compliance decreased to greater extent in group B (19 ± 3.7 ml/cmH2O). PaCO2 was higher in group A during pneumoperitoneum.( 35.52 ± 1.89, p = 0.004). There was greater increase in heart rate, SBP, DBP, MAP following PLMA insertion. Adverse events were comparable in both groups. Conclusion: I-Gel is associated with lower peak airway pressures, EtCO2, PaCO2 and higher mean airway pressures during pneumoperitoneum compared to PLMA and hence may provide better ventilation. I-Gel provides better haemodynamic stability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-08

How to Cite

Nisarga, R., Bhavana, D. A., Devika Rani, D., & Nethra, S. S. (2019). Comparison of Ventilation and Haemodynamic Parameters between I-Gel and Proseal LMA in Adult Patients undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia. Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal, 17(3-4), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj/2019/v17i3-4/150719

Issue

Volume 17, Issue 3-4, July-December 2019

Section

Clinical Investigations
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Joris JL. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Erikson LL, Fleischer LA, KronishJPW, Young WL, eds. Miller’s Anaesthesia. United States of America: Churchill livingstone 2010; 7(1):4678-718.

Cork RC, Depa RM, Standen JR. Prospective comparison of use of the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube for ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1994; 79:719-27. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199410000-00018 PMid:7943782.

Keller C, Brimacombe J, Bittersohl J, Lirk P, von Goedecke A. Aspiration and the laryngeal mask airway: Three cases and a review of the literature. Br J Anaesth. 2004; 93:579-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh228 PMid:15247112.

Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophagealseal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel TM in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic TM and ProSealTM using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102(1):135-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen319 PMid:19011262.

Brain AI, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA ‘ProSeal’-A laryngeal mask with anoesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84:650-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/84.5.650 PMid:10844848.

Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Brimacombe N, Scully M, Barry J et al. Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal. mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females. Anesthesio. 2000; 93:26-31.85. https://doi. org/10.1097/00000542-200007000-00009 PMid:10861142.

Theiler L, Gutzmann M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Urwyler N, Kaempfen B, Greif R. I-gelsupraglottic airway in clinical practice: A prospective observational multicentre study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2012; 109(6):990-5. https:// doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes309 PMid:22956643.

Nagappala R, McGoldrick K. Comparison of the LMAclassic (TM) with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients. Surv Anesth. 2004; 98:179. https://doi.org/10.1097/01. sa.0000132004.32857.bc.

Saraswat N, Kumar A, Mishra A, Gupth A, et al. The comparison of proseal laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries undergeneral anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2011; 55(2):129-34 https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.79891 PMid:21712868 PMCid:PMC3106384.

Gul R, Goksu S, Ugur BK, Koruk S, et al., Comparison of proseal laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube foe airway safety in paediatric strabismus surgery. Saudi Med J. 2012; 33(4):388-94..

Suchita S, Parekh SB, Chaula D, Vyas V. Proseal laryngeal mask airway versus cuffed endotracheal tube for laparoscopic surgical procedures under general anaesthesia. Anaesth Essays and Researches. 2017; 11(4):958-63. https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_97_17 PMid:29284856 PMCid:PMC5735495.

Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert D, Fick GH. The LMA-ProSealTM is an effective alternative to tracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth. 2002; 49:857-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF03017420 PMid:12374716.

Poonam AJ, Naina PD, Bharathi AT. I-Gel versus proseal laryngeal mask airway: Comparison of two supraglottic airway device in short surgical procedures. Journ of Anaesth Clinical Pharmacol. 2015; 31(2):221-25.86. https:// doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.155153. PMid:25948905 PMCid:PMC4411838.

Kini G, Devanna GM, Mukkapati KR, et al., Comparison of I-Gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia without paralysis; A prospective study. Journ of Anaesth Clinical Pharmacol. 2014; 30(2)183-7. https:// doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130008. PMid:24803754 PMCid:PMC4009636.

Pelosi P, Foti G, Cereda M, Vicardi P, Gattinoni L. Effects of carbon dioxide in sufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the respiratory system. Anaesthesia.1996; 51:744- 9.90 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb06199.x PMid:8795317.

Cunningham AJ, Brull SJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Anesthetic implications. Anesth Analg. 1993; 76:1120- 33. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199305000-00035 PMid:8053989.

O’Malley C, Cunningham AJ. Physiologic changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol ClinN Am. 2001; 19(1):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8537(05)70208-X.

Ahmed A, Abd El Aziz, Elham M. A comparative evaluation of different supraglottic ventilatory devices during general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Egyptian J of Anaesth. 2014; 30:359-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. egja.2014.05.003.

Nirupa R, Gombar S, Ahuja V, Sharma P. A randomised trial to compare I-gel and ProSealâ„¢ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2016; 60:726-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019- 5049.191670 PMid:27761035 PMCid:PMC5064696.

Saran S, Mishra SK, Badhe AK, Vasudevan A, Lakkumanan LB, Mishra G. Comparison of I-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation. J of Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2014; 30(2):195-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.130013. PMid:24803756 PMCid:PMC4009638.

Chauhan G, Syal K, Prasad V, Verma RK. I-Gel versus proseal laryngeal mask airway: A comparison between two supraglottic airway devices in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Karnataka Anaesth J. 2017; 3:23- 7.

Sharma B, Sehgal B, Sahai C, Sood J. PLMA vs. i-gel: a comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 26(4):451-7.

Most read articles by the same author(s)